psychological anthropology final project – writinghub.net

psychological anthropology final project – writinghub.net

Total need 10 full pages. MLA format, need to use at least 10 scholar source, and at least 3 readings from attached files. So total at least 13 resources.

This paper is about psychological anthropology, so please find one topic that is related to psychological anthropology and write one research paper. Must include interview part, need to interview 1to 3 people. The interview part can all be made up. but make sure it is reliable in this research paper, (topic can include: social medias effect on women body image, stressors of undergraduate’s and their mental health.sibling birth order)

All papers should follow proper format, including introduction with primary topic and either research question or central argument/thesis. In the body of the paper, you should incorporate your interview findings, framework for analysis, and key sources including those previously identified as required and any further sources you need to complete your analysis. Your conclusion should summarize your paper. Your bibliography should include works cited, and reflect required references. All material from sources, including from lectures, interviews, published works, and other students in the course should be cited within your text and in your works cited section.

All papers should be:

  • Double spaced
  • Written in 12-point font
  • Formatted with 1 inch margins
  • 10 pages long for undergraduate students.
  • Properly cited

ANTH 413/513 Final Paper Grading Rubric

ANTH 413/513 Final Paper

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper meets formatting specifications

2.0 pts

Full Marks

Double spaced Written in 12-point font Formatted with 1 inch margins 10 pages long for undergraduate students and 15 to 20 pages long for graduate students

1.0 pts

Satisfactory

Half of the formatting requirements are met or formatting somewhat impairs reading.

0.0 pts

Not Satisfactory

None of the criteria are met and formatting impairs reading

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper integrates required sources

5.0 pts

Full Marks

Minimum 10 scholarly sources and minimum 3 course sources are well integrated.

4.0 pts

Good

Scholarly sources and/or course sources are present, but inconsistently integrated.

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

Scholarly sources and course sources are present, but superficially integrated.

2.0 pts

Not Satisfactory

Not all scholarly sources or course sources are present.

1.0 pts

Poor

Half the scholarly sources are not present and/or course material not present.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No reference to additional sources.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations and Reference List are in APA or MLA format and used consistently.

3.0 pts

Full Marks

Citations are properly formatted Citations are consistently used. Reference list is present and complete

2.0 pts

Satisfactory

Citations not always complete and/or Inconsistent citation use and/or Reference list incomplete

1.0 pts

Not Satisfactory

Citations almost fully absent and/or sources are not cited and/or reference list absent

0.0 pts

No Marks

Citations and reference list are absent.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

5.0 pts

Full Marks

Gives a strong introduction to the paper by stating topic, framework, and research question and/or thesis statement.

4.0 pts

Good

Introduction has all elements, but is too long or organization inhibits clarity.

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

One element missing. Organization somewhat inhibits clarity.

2.0 pts

Not Satisfactory

More than one element missing.

1.0 pts

Poor

Minimal introduction to the paper given.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Opening paragraph does not introduce the paper. Required elements not stated.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterviews and sources are integrated to form an analysis that follows from the introductory research question and/or thesis statement.

20.0 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

Paper draws logical connections between interviews and sources. Paper relates to and explains the central research question and/or thesis statement. Paper reads logically and smoothly.

18.0 to >16.0 pts

Good

Paper generally draws logical connections between interviews and sources, though some leaps in logic are made. Paper generally relates to and explains the central research question, and/or thesis statement, though may diverge in instances.

16.0 to >14.0 pts

Average

Paper does not well integrate interview data with other sources. There is no clear or no consistent relationship between these two types of data sources. Paper contains leaps in logic or writing is not always logically organized.

14.0 to >12.5 pts

Below Average

Paper does not integrate interview data and other sources. One or the other may be largely absent. Significant leaps in logic are made or there are significant issues with the organization of the paper.

12.5 to >0 pts

No Marks

Paper fails to meaningfully meet requirements for argument, data integration, and logic.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

5.0 pts

Full Marks

Conclusion summarizes the paper well.

4.0 pts

Good

Conclusion is present, but inadequately summarizes the paper.

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

Conclusion is present but superficially summarizes the paper.

2.0 pts

Not Satisfactory

Minimal concluding writing offered.

1.0 pts

No Marks

No conclusion present.

0.0 pts

Poor

Almost no conclusion present.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Writing Hub